$201-300 BGVP DM7 IEM

BGVP DM7 Review | Headfonics

Disclaimer: The BGVP DM7 despatched to us is a sample in trade for our trustworthy opinion. We thank the staff at BGVP, and Linsoul for giving us this opportunity.

You’ll be able to learn up on our BGVP DM6 evaluate right here.

You may as well take a look at their Drop marketing campaign right here.

Identical to the DM6, the DM7 and its mum or dad company learn from a spec sheet like a automotive’s number plate. But having reviewed the DM7, I was ready for the DM7, and absolutely acknowledged BGVP is a market pressure, and one absolutely entrenched within the FOTM membership.

With six drivers per aspect, the DM7 is even a crazier tour de drive. One thing I’m wondering: if the DM6 has five drivers per aspect, and the DM7, six drivers per aspect, is it right to say that a DM8 may have seven drivers? Here’s the kicker: will a hypothetical DM0 have a unfavorable variety of drivers? Is such a universe even potential?

Tech Inside

With six drivers per aspect and virtually ten years because the JH13Pro’s intro, the DM7 actually harkens again to the earphone that absolutely blew the market up. In fact, the DM7 isn’t 1100$ USD. Yikes. Just like the DM6, the DM7’s internal workings are open to inspection. This time, that shell is even clearer. It’s additionally virtually crammed to the brim with resin. This jogs my memory of FitEar’s flagship custom earphones.

And the DM7 being a custom-cum-universal, it’s only fitting that I’m so reminded.

Construct High quality

The DM7 is a bit heavier and a bit more strong feeling than the DM6, but the two are comparable. Just like the DM6, the DM7’s workmanship is top quality. Its wiring is clean if tangled, and as far as I can inform, there are not any fingerprints or sealing blemishes. Here and there are bubbles, but even they’re seldom seen. It’s as nicely made as a high-end custom from the JH13Professional days.

The sound tube is even busier, sporting 4 tubes, every thinner and more cramped than earlier than. Two are damped, one with foam, one with an aluminum cap. Also, like the DM6, the tube lacks wax/particles filters. It’s all very custom-like, a reality about which I’m both glad and upset.


Cables and Connectors

Just like the DM6’s cable, the DM7’s is thick, usually freed from microphonic noise, and powerful. Additionally it is handsome and feels of top of the range. Its colours are more somber and the cable’s wires, are suppler than earlier than and loosely weaved as compared. This makes it easier to wrap back up as well as even less microphonic.

What’s not good is that braiding errors show up extra typically, and the sliding neck cinch, as soon as an affordable but largely unobtrusive silicon brief sleeve, is now an affordable plastic marble. Sure, it is harder. Yes, it is simpler to slip. But gosh does it make the DM6 cable appear to be a garage-level product.

As a result of it’s bigger, the DM7 is a bit simpler to remove from and insert into the ear. That is nice for the traditional and large-fingered among us.

Additionally, like the DM6, the DM7 is mild. In contrast to the DM6, its cables, softer and extra supple, make it nicer to fit across the ear.


Consolation and Match

The DM7 is snug within the ear as the DM6. It’s larger and easier to get out and in. And its cables and heat shrink are softer, making the DM7 rather a lot nicer for glasses wearers. In fact, as a result of the cable continues to be thick, and, relying on the power of your glasses frame, it might pressure glasses arms up, or down, or out. Nonetheless, it’s higher than the DM6’s cable.

Aside from the foams, not a single silicon DM6 earpiece was snug for my delicate ears. The DM7’s are higher, virtually throughout. Even their seamed black items are softer. The clear pieces’ strong cores maintain their mouths vast open however aren’t snug in my ears. The new gray pieces are great: not only are they tender and lack equatorial seams, but additionally they pivot on discrete fulcrums, whose pink bits and grey bits cant differentially, fitting virtually any unusually bent ear canal. The high-density foams are the same, and cozy. Unfortunately, each the foams and the gray silicon pieces crowd the canal a bit extra, occluding part of the sound output. It appears that for wide-bore sound tubes, sound quality or fidelity and comfort are mutually exclusive.

Just like the DM6, the larger DM7 thrusts itself out from the ear quite than throughout the ear. It’s doesn’t stretch the tragus, and because of it will fit usually medium sized ears without hassle. Small ears will feel cramped. I doubt that many Asian females will have the ability to get the DM7 of their ears.

Personally, the soft-sided gray ideas isolate one of the best of the silicon bunch, and, alarmingly, create a vacuum seal within my ear. Breaking this previous to removing is one thing I durst not overlook.


Accessories & Packaging

Including the box, the DM7’s accessory package deal and presentation have improved. The Hello-Res Audio badge is printed fairly than caught individually on, and in matte black, is decidedly higher-end. The wireframe earphones on its entrance, nevertheless, sit at strange angles and doubtless ought to be larger. That little bit of dangerous branding apart, all the set is an enormous upgrade next to the DM6’s. The ear pads sit in their own foam wells. (And sure, those wells stink, but nothing like Tin HiFi’s foam inserts.)

Together with foams and default pieces, there at the moment are ten sets of earpieces, six of which are strong core (clear and black), and three of which differentially pivot. I’ve examined all of them, and that latter set is by far my favorite- at the very least relating to match.

The accent package deal alone would answer questions of whether or not BGVP listened to customer considerations about match, branding, and extra. What an improve.

Tonality and Presentation

It is exceptional how comparable the DM7 sounds to a DM6-‘ified Audio Technica CK10. Since the CK10 is my favorite earphone of all time, this is a really good thing. It is warmer in the lows and mids than the CK10, and not quite as spicy up top. Its stage isn’t as wide-set, nor are its devices as scalpelled one from one other; however hell, all the necessary at-face bits the CK10 does rather well are there.

It is brighter than the DM6, especially within the upper mids, the place the DM6 typically went a bit uninteresting. Talking about sound this manner is strange to me. Within the last 5 years, I’ve undergone a change. Early on I favored full-flat impartial shows with super-wide, detailed stereo scapes. Flat, flat, and flat broad. That was it. However after hitting thirty-four, I really go to liking warmth and depth. It’s why I really like the Hidizs MS4. Nonetheless, the brilliant, flat, and extensive CK10 stays my favorite earphone of all time. It’s a set of issues, from consolation to build, to sound, actually, that retains me. The CK10 isn’t as in a position because the MS4 to disclose the friction details in percussion, nor as capable of describe the underside of a subwoofer burst.

Neither is the DM7, but the best way it closes the space between the 2 is sufficient. I really like the DM7 in a method that I might by no means love the DM6.


No, the DM7 isn’t a stage monster. It spits a wide, comparatively stereo-detailed sound stage, however it doesn’t fade laterally as far as a CK10, T2, or the like. It, does, nevertheless, spread wider than a DM6; more importantly, its mids aren’t recessed in either strain or stereo scape.

Particulars come via, with an virtually centripetal push to the middle. And that middle has ample detail. Towards the DM6, that central element keeps anchor around the head, pulling consideration into it, and less typically bumping towards stray bass blooms.

There’s also a bit less smear throughout percussion, allowing for a clearer, studio-close presentation. The dangerous aspect of this is that, while the DM6 typically pulled the cozy cover over the X, Y, and Z axes, the DM7 shoves it back down once more. Obviously, the difference isn’t night time and day, however where it exhibits, the DM7’s clearer mids pull you in.

Y-axis peak is sweet, jumping as high because the brow and dropping to under the jaw, and inside that area, the Z-axis moves forward a great step or so. Within that is room to the best and left and a really clear 3D sense defined by all of that plus good instrument separation.



The DM7’s bass is nice. So far as I can inform, it isn’t much totally different to the DM6’s, however where stereo detail is essential, it’s received more. It’s similarly raised above impartial by a few step and a half, however this time, with much less inward press. This diffuses a few of its sound strain and provides the lows more air.

In fast-paced music, lows can actually kick, however, like the DM6, they don’t go super low- no less than not low enough to actually render much of a yawn into the opening seconds of Marcus Schulz’s Mainstage.

Bass stereo presence presses out to the collar bone and drops about as low. It reaches up to concerning the eyeballs, and steps ahead about half a step.

All in all, even fast-paced bass cues feather out to nothing with out recoil, and anchor bass is about as bloom-free as I’ve heard. Naturally, bass attack and decay are nearly right on.

Should you really actually like excessive bass strain, the DM7 gained’t do extra for you than the DM6 did. Add to that clearer distinction between lows and mids than the DM6 and you’ve got a very, but fast-acting balanced low-range output. Positive, it does hip hop nicely, however it gained’t hold on to or exacerbate bloom the place you may prefer it to. Mid and high bass blend really smoothly into low mids.

Mids and highs

So far as I can tell, the DM7 is brighter than the DM6, though not terribly so. It’s just as freed from sibilance as the DM6, and get borderline hot-ish when reproducing fast electronic chimes and percussion in bass heavy, V-shaped music. Like the DM6, excessive reverb is minimal, and so far as I can tell, the body is perfectly damped towards shell-induced reverb/echoes. Truthfully, I expected its highs to do the DM6 thing domineer a bit over the mids. As an alternative, the DM7’s highs fly flat out to the aspect, virtually evenly, with few to no peaks that I can suss.

So far as I can tell, in non-electronic, studio-recorded music, highs don’t get hot- or if they do, it’s virtually imperceptible. Because of this flat-field high range, mids stand out extra towards highs and lows.

In comparison with the DM6, stereo detail is finer and extra dynamic. Small stereo nuances stand out extra within the highs and lows, and midrange stereo detail and placement are wonderful.

Principally, for those who appreciated the DM6’s highs and mids, there’s more of the latter in the DM7, and the previous has better-formed stereo detail engine in addition to a defense towards high-end warmth.



The DM7 is a number of steps more delicate than the DM6 and about half again extra sensitive compared to the Audio Technica CK10. It is about as susceptible to hiss because the Hidizs MS1/4.

Due to this, it is nice with high-quality DAPs and smartphones that don’t hiss however is an actual bugger with sources of any type that do. Because of this, the DM6 is way simpler to match to quite a lot of sources.

Select Comparisons

Hidizs MS1

The MS1 is brighter and in sure frequencies, wider, than the DM7, but the difference in staging between the MS1 and the DM7 vis-a-vis the DM6 aren’t massive. The DM7 is warmer in all the appropriate methods. It’s obtained extra and better bass and strikes an amazing stability between shiny and heat, where the MS1 errs vibrant.

It hisses roughly as much as the MS1, which makes both dangerous decisions depending on the standard of your supply’s output amplifier. Positive, there’s 200$ between them, but the MS1 is not any mean design, and it actually stands out at its worth level. The DM7 is best in just about every area, but if you’d like the last bit of stereo width, the MS1 is the one to choose.


The DM6 is warmer, has a more crowded stage, less stability between bass and highs towards mids, and rides a extra violent V-shape signature than the DM7.

The DM7, with its better smoothing frequency transitions, makes for a neater pay attention for a big number of genres towards the DM6. Alas, it’s way more delicate, making it a poor companion for MD, sure DAPs, computers, and noisy desktop sources than the DM6, Yinyoo B2B4, and others.

Hidizs MS4

The MS4 is ideal – if you need heat, texture depth, and worth emotion over between-frequency decision. I adore it. Nevertheless it’s too sensitive. And so is the DM7. But the DM7 is the more balanced, and by no means gets too scorching, heavy, or shiny. As you already know, the MS4 can get all of that, and at the mistaken occasions. T

he drawback is that being just as delicate as the MS4, the DM7 fails in the same areas. The DM7 is extra balanced and more impartial than the MS4. If that sounds good, nicely, the DM7 positive as heck does.

Yinyoo D2B4

The DM7 straddles the area between the DM6 and D2B4. To be trustworthy, the D2B4’s more ahead presentation is usually my cup of tea, however for what the DM7 appears to be making an attempt to do, I feel it’s spot on.

I really want it hissed as little because the D2B4. The extra I take heed to the D2B4, I really wish more earphones have been extra just like the D2B4. That stated, the DM7’s more impartial and perhaps better-delineated sound might be one for the neutral books.


At 299$ the BGVP DM7 battles it out with numerous actually really good earphones. Towards the DM7, the Hidizs MS4 loses out because when hitting the flawed areas, it will get scorching and heavy. The DM7’s predominately neutral signature is nice for any music. And it does every part quick and with moderation. It is definitely higher than the DM6.

And the place wanted it is each warm and large. Truthfully, I wish it had a bit more sub-bass sound strain as I really miss hitting these crazy lows. I feel the 100$ difference between the DM6 and the DM7 is value it.


Our Verdict

The DM7 is the DM6 that should have been. It does a lot right and in all the correct locations, that I’m ready to forgive how much it hisses when paired with dangerous sources. It’s better by a superb long shot than the DM7 and one of the best earphone in the worth vary I’ve reviewed here at Headfonics.

Diminishing returns being what they are, the DM7 exhibits properly towards higher-priced earphones, however towards actually well-engineered finances earphones is itself pushed towards a wall.

For 299$, it’s a great buy.

BGVP DM7 Specs

  • Driving unit: six balanced armature models
  • Sensitivity: 115dB SPL/MW
  • Enter impedance: 13.5 Ω
  • Frequency response: 10 Hz-40 kHz
  • Distortion price: ≤0.5%(1 KHZ)
  • Cable length: 1.2m ±5%
  • Weight: round 5.3g
  • Cable: Single crystal copper + single-crystal silver-plated copper wire
  • Normal gear: vocal sleeve S/M/L, equalizing sleeve S/M/L, packing package deal X1, brush X1

BGVP DM7 Review

4 (80%) 6 vote[s]


Build Quality8.four

Consolation & Fit8.3