Google Google Pixel 3a

Google Pixel 3a Display Review

Google’s newest handset, the Pixel 3a, has been making tons of headlines—at its forefront, it boasts the famend imaging prowess of the Pixels’ cameras at a more reasonably priced worth range, and it maintains the simplicity and aesthetic of its pricier counterparts.

Much to my shock, the Google Pixel 3a not solely comes with flagship-competing cameras, but its display is among the most color-accurate in the smartphone world in its Pure shade profile, which complements its imaging chops rather well. It’s not likely that shocking, although; Google has been leading the pack in chroma calibrations for some time now, and each Pixel telephone to date has been very well-tuned for shade, even the dreaded Pixel 2 XL (which was plagued with different points, but chroma calibration wasn’t considered one of them). Nevertheless, the Pixel 3a show’s strengths finish there.


  • Exceptional white point accuracy and consistency
  • Distinctive colour accuracy in Pure profile


  • Subpar peak brightness and daylight legibility (in comparison with flagships)
  • Shadow tones not well-reproduced
  • Limited extensive shade gamut—doesn’t cowl P3

Google Pixel 3a Performance Summary

The Pixel 3a makes use of a 5.6-inch 2220×1080 (18.5:9) Samsung panel with 441 pixels per inch. For a mid-range show, it’s considerably sharp, and it should seem as sharp as most flagships until you are likely to deal with your telephones actually shut or just have extraordinary visual acuity.

The uniformity on my panel is okay—all sectors of the show are lower than a ΔE of two from the middle, with a barely-noticeable ΔE of 2.6 comparing the top-left of the show to the top-right, since there’s a slightly hotter “bleed” on the top-right of my display.

For the Pixel 3 and Pixel three XL, Google put in wonderful polarization layers that considerably lowered display reflections and viewing angle tints, and those needed to be compromised in slicing prices for the Pixel 3a. The Pixel 3a is using less-effective layers, shifting segments of the display in the direction of pink, inexperienced, or blue at small sudden angles and rainbowing out near the sides. Additionally they don’t filter out as much incident mild as current flagships, causing greater display reflections, and permitting the OLED layer to bleed by means of and turn into more seen. The circular polarizer layer, which was introduced in the Pixel 2, was additionally omitted on the Pixel 3a.

The display brightness is bottom-of-the-barrel in typical Google type. The show will get nearly as brilliant as another Google telephone, about 400–450 nits. There’s most definitely a high brightness mode in the panel that Google doesn’t wish to faucet in to, however maybe because the Pixel 3a has a mid-range panel it won’t get that much brighter anyway. There’s a lot to be desired from all of Google’s displays, as none of them are notably pleasurable to make use of outdoor.

The Pixel 3a defaults to a shade saturation-expanding profile that Google calls “Adaptive”, although I’m nonetheless not sure what’s “adaptive” at all about it. I’m nonetheless strongly averse to this determination, as I consider content material must be originally served how it was meant to whereas preserving the setting to increase content material saturation as an choice. The Boosted profile is the Pure profile with a roughly 10% improve in saturation, though this profile should as an alternative be a saturation slider since there is a system useful resource that controls the saturation degree of the show between zero% and 200%, with Boosted merely setting the worth to 1.1 (110%).

The color-accurate profile is the Pure profile, which I’ve measured to be probably the most chromatically accurate on the Android aspect of handsets in reproducing the sRGB colour area. This is the profile that ought to be the default, given how accurate Google has calibrated it along with the information that vast colour photographs are coming to Android, which wouldn’t work properly in the Adaptive profile resulting from its lack of colour management. Sadly, the panel in the Pixel 3a doesn’t absolutely cowl the P3 colour area since its pink emitter does not get saturated sufficient. The white point in this profile, in addition to within the other two profiles, seem utterly correct to D65, although Google lists the Pixel 3a to have a D67 white point. The tone response of the display tends to render shade tones just-slightly darker than normal, leading to a display with barely extra contrast than what is considered correct. At the low end, the Pixel 3a has a bit of hassle reproducing very dark scenes, and it does clip blacks a bit more than different displays.

Methodology ▼

To acquire quantitative shade knowledge from the display, we stage device-specific enter check patterns to the handset and measure the display’s ensuing emission using an i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer. The check patterns and gadget settings we use are corrected for numerous display traits and potential software implementations that can alter our desired measurements. Many different websites’ show analyses don’t properly account for them and consequently, their knowledge could also be inaccurate.

We first measure the show’s full grayscale and report the perceptual shade error of white, along with its correlated colour temperature. From the readings, we also derive the show gamma utilizing a least-squares match on the theoretical gamma values of every step. This gamma worth is more meaningful and true-to-experience than people who report the gamma reading from display calibration software program like CalMan, which averages the theoretical gamma of every step as an alternative.

The colors that we goal for our check patterns are impressed by DisplayMate’s absolute colour accuracy plots. The color targets are spaced roughly even all through the CIE 1976 chromaticity scale, which makes them wonderful targets to evaluate the entire colour copy capabilities of a show.

The grayscale and shade accuracy readings are taken in increments of 20% over the show’s perceptual (non-linear) brightness vary and averaged to realize a single studying that is correct to the overall look of the display. One other particular person reading is taken at our reference 200 cd/m² which is an effective white degree for typical workplace circumstances and indoor lighting.

We primarily use the color distinction measurement CIEDE2000 (shortened to ΔE) as a metric for chromatic accuracy. ΔE is the business normal colour difference metric proposed by the Worldwide Commission on Illumination (CIE) that greatest describes uniform variations between colours. Other shade distinction metrics exist as nicely, reminiscent of the colour difference Δu′v′ on the CIE 1976 chromaticity scale, however such metrics have been discovered to be inferior in perceptual uniformity when assessing for visual noticeability, as the edge for visible noticeability between measured colors and target colors can range wildly between colour difference metrics. For example, a shade distinction Δu′v′ of zero.zero10 isn’t visually noticeable for blue, but the identical measured shade difference for yellow is noticeable at a look. Notice that ΔE is just not good itself, however it has come to be probably the most empirically-accurate shade difference metric that at present exists.

ΔE usually considers luminance error in its computation, since luminance is a crucial element to utterly describe shade. Nevertheless, because the human visual system interprets chromaticity and luminance separately, we maintain our checks patterns at a continuing luminance and compensate the luminance error out of our ΔE values. Furthermore, it’s helpful to separate the two errors when assessing a show’s efficiency because, identical to our visual system, it pertains to totally different issues with the display. This manner we will extra completely analyze and understand the performance of a display.

When the measured shade difference ΔE is above, the color difference might be visually observed at a glance. When the measured colour difference ΔE is between 1.0 and a couple of.3, the difference in colour can solely be observed in diagnostic circumstances (e.g. when the measured shade and target shade seem proper next to the opposite on the display being measured), otherwise, the colour distinction is just not visually noticeable and seems accurate. A measured shade difference ΔE of 1.0 or much less is claimed to be utterly imperceptible, and the measured colour appears indistinguishable from the goal colour even when adjoining to it.

Display power consumption is measured by the slope of the linear regression between the handset battery drain and show luminance. Battery drain is observed and averaged over three minutes at 20% steps of brightness and trialed a number of occasions while minimizing exterior sources of battery drain.

Colour Profiles

The Google Pixel 3a maintains the identical three profiles as on the previous Pixels: Pure, Boosted, and Adaptive, with Adaptive because the default.

The Pure profile is the accurate, color-managed profile that targets the sRGB shade area for non-contexted colour values. Regardless of Google’s specification sheet itemizing the Pixel 3a as having a D67 white point, I measured the Natural profile to have an astoundingly correct D65 white level across its brightness vary.

The Boosted profile is predicated on the Pure profile and, in accordance with Google, increases saturation in all directions by 10%. This description isn’t utterly trustworthy, nevertheless, because the perception of the increase in colour differs for the three primaries: Inexperienced colours obtain the very best improve in perceived saturation, followed by reds, and blues present virtually no discernible increase. Moreover, the increase in saturation for purple and green isn’t in the identical hue course, with greens tinting slightly in the direction of yellow, giving them a barely warmer tint, and reds also tinting in the direction of yellow, making them appear extra orange. The profile is definitely still very color-accurate, save for highly-saturated reds-to-greens.

The default Adaptive profile stretches out the saturation of all colours: Greens are saturated probably the most and tinted barely cooler, whereas reds and blues are saturated about equally, with reds tinting in the direction of yellow. The profile shares the identical white point as the Natural profile, which differs from the Pixel 3 where their Adaptive profile has a cooler white point than the Pure profile.


Our show brightness comparability charts examine the maximum show brightness of the Google Pixel 3a relative to other displays that we’ve got measured. The labels on the horizontal axis on the underside of the chart symbolize the multipliers for the difference in perceived brightness relative to the Google Pixel 3a show, which is fastened at “1×”. The magnitude of the shows’ brightnesses, measured in candelas per square meter, or nits, are logarithmically scaled in line with Steven’s Power Regulation utilizing the modality exponent for the perceived brightness of some extent source, scaled proportionally to the brightness of the Google Pixel 3a display. This is completed because the human eye has a logarithmic response to perceived brightness. Other charts that present brightness values on a linear scale don’t properly symbolize the difference in perceived brightness of the displays.

When measuring the display performance of an OLED panel, it is very important perceive how its know-how differs from traditional LCD panels. LCDs require a backlight to move mild via shade filters that block wavelengths of sunshine to supply the colours that we see. An OLED panel is capable of having every of its individual subpixels emit their very own mild. Because of this the OLED panel must share a specific amount of power to each lit pixel from its maximum allotment. Thus, the more subpixels that have to be lit up, the more that the panel’s power must be divided over the lit subpixels, and the less power that every subpixel receives.

The APL (common pixel degree) of an image is the typical proportion of each pixels’ individual RGB elements throughout the whole picture. For instance, a totally purple, green, or blue picture has an APL of 33%, since every image consists of utterly lighting up solely one of the three subpixels. The entire colour mixtures cyan (green and blue), magenta (pink and blue), or yellow (pink and green) have an APL of 67%, and a full-white image that utterly lights up all three subpixels has an APL of 100%. Moreover, a picture that’s half black and half white has an APL of 50%. Lastly, for OLED panels, the upper the entire on-screen content material APL, the decrease the relative brightness of every of the lit pixels. LCD panels do not exhibit this attribute (barring local dimming), and because of it, they are typically much brighter at larger APLs than OLED panels.

Google doesn’t have a history of having brilliant displays—in any respect—and the Pixel 3a is not any totally different. That is more acceptable on the Pixel 3a, nevertheless, because it’s Google’s mid-range gadget. At 50% APL, which is an effective pixel degree to attribute to the standard brightness of a display, the Pixel 3a emits 442 nits, which is middle-of-the-road for shows and not using a high brightness mode and is totally superb for its worth level. The brightness drops off to a minimum of 406 nits at 100% APL, which can also be simply high-quality. At these brightness ranges, the display does have legibility points outdoor, which customers could have to remember.

At its dimmest, the Google Pixel 3a can obtain a white degree as low as 1.7 nits, which is dimmer than what most other handset shows are capable of (excluding handsets capable of DC dimming), together with the Samsung Galaxy S10 (1.eight nits) and the Apple iPhone XS (1.eight nits). The Pixel 3a gets much noticeably dimmer than the Pixel 3 (-29%) and the Pixel three XL (-23%).

Contrast & Tone Response

The gamma of a show determines the overall picture distinction and lightness of the colours on a display. The business normal gamma that’s to be used on most displays follows a power perform of two.20. Larger display gamma powers will end in greater picture contrast and darker colour mixtures, which the film business is progressing in the direction of, but smartphones are seen in many various lighting circumstances where greater gamma powers aren’t applicable. Our gamma plot under is a log-log illustration of a shade’s lightness as seen on the Google Pixel 3a display versus its associated input drive degree. Measured points which might be greater than the 2.20 line imply the color tone seems brighter than commonplace, whereas decrease than the 2.20 line means the colour tone appears darker than commonplace. The axes are scaled logarithmically because the human eye has a logarithmic response to perceived brightness.

Most trendy flagship smartphone displays now come with calibrated colour profiles which might be chromatically accurate. Nevertheless, because of the OLED property of decreasing the typical lightness of the colors on the display with growing content APL, the primary difference in the complete shade accuracy of recent flagship OLED shows is now in the resulting gamma of the display. The gamma makes up the achromatic (grayscale element) image, or the structure of the image, which humans are more delicate in perceiving. Subsequently, it is rather necessary that the ensuing gamma of a show matches that of the content material’s, which usually follows the business normal 2.20 power perform.

The Google Pixel 3a has a reasonably accurate display gamma, albeit just-slightly greater than commonplace, resulting in barely darker shade tones that are extra prevalent in extremely saturated patches.

The Google Pixel 3a slightly flops in rendering shadow particulars, persistently rendering shadows darker and crashing in luminance under 5% signal degree. The Pixel 3a clips utterly black at sign levels under three% (shade byte values under 7) at 200 nits, which correlates to luminance values under ~zero.zero08 nits. This performs significantly worse than most OLEDs, together with that of the Pixel three XL, however not as dangerous as on the Pixel 3. Google’s Pixel phones have persistently had subpar black rendering, and it’s definitely as a consequence of their calibration and not hardware.

Google Pixel 3a Display Gamma

Shade Accuracy

Our colour accuracy plots present readers with a tough assessment of the color efficiency and calibration developments of a show. Shown under is the base for the color accuracy targets, plotted on the CIE 1976 chromaticity scale, with the circles representing the target colors.

Base Shade Accuracy Plots chart

Within the colour accuracy plots under, the white dots symbolize the place of the Google Pixel 3a’s measured colors. The associated trailing colour represents the severity of the color error. Green trails signify that the measured shade distinction could be very small and that the color seems accurate on the display, while yellow trails indicate noticeable colour variations, with greater severity at orange and pink trails.

The Pure profile is as accurate as it gets—the Pixel 3a can reproduce the sRGB colour area without blemish (save for black clipping). The profile has an indistinguishable-from-perfect common shade error ΔE of zero.eight with a really low normal deviation of zero.5. The most important shade distinction we measured read a ΔE of two.5 at 75%-saturation blue, which is unnoticeable and appears correct.

The Google Pixel 3a panel can’t absolutely cowl the P3 gamut because the purple emitter doesn’t get saturated sufficient, but the Natural profile still reproduces the remainder of the P3 shade area rather well. The attraction to the P3 shade area does lie in those high-saturation reds, nevertheless, so although the typical general colour distinction of the Natural profile to the P3 shade area is low, it isn’t a well-representative metric until it may well hit these deep reds.

Drive Stability

The colour temperature of a white mild source describes how “warm” or “cold” the sunshine appears. Shade sometimes wants no less than two points to be described, while the correlated colour temperature is a one-dimensional descriptor that leaves out important chromaticity info for simplicity.

The sRGB colour area targets a white level with a D65 (6504 Okay) shade temperature. Concentrating on a white point with D65 shade temperature is important in shade accuracy because the white level impacts the appearance of every shade mixture. Observe that, nevertheless, a white level with a correlated shade temperature that is close to 6504 Okay might not essentially seem correct! There are various colour mixtures that can have the same correlated shade temperature (referred to as iso-CCT strains) — some that don’t even appear white. Due to this, the color temperature shouldn’t be used as a metric for white point shade accuracy. As an alternative, we use it as a device to characterize the rough look of the white level of a display and how it shifts over its brightness and grayscale. Regardless of the goal shade temperature of a display, ideally its correlated shade temperature of white ought to stay constant at all drive ranges, which would seem as a straight line in our chart under.

The drive stability charts show how the intensities of the person purple, inexperienced, and blue LEDs range with display brightness, overlain with the show’s correlated shade temperature of white, they usually reveal the “tightness” of the colour calibration of the show. The charts present rather more shade info than the one-dimensional colour temperature chart. Ideally, the pink green and blue LEDs should stay as consistent as attainable throughout the show’s brightness vary.

Google Pixel 3a Color Temperature

The Pure profile is calibrated tightly with very little variance, maintaining an accurate D65 white level even at low sign levels. Because of this there ought to be little-to-no discernible shift within the colours on the Pixel 3a show when rendering them at a unique brightness, and the colour will keep its chromaticity when rendered at a lighter or darker tone. This is essential since many displays shift the appearance of the colors, particularly the white point, either hotter or cooler as brightness will increase or decreases. The Google Pixel 3a display renders colours persistently throughout its brightness range in its Natural profile, and this can be a very spectacular calibration feat solely equally achieved by Apple. The Pixel three and Pixel 3 XL will not be calibrated this tightly, most certainly because of their wider gamuts, so it is extremely impressive to see it in Google’s mid-range handset.

Google Pixel 3a Drive Balance

Vendor panels are often baseline factory-calibrated at or near their native gamut, so it isn’t unusual for colour profiles with the widest gamut to be calibrated probably the most tightly. That doesn’t seem to be the case with the Adaptive profile, as we measured a better variance from the profile than on the Natural profile. It’s because the Adaptive profile isn’t just based mostly on the panel’s native gamut, so it requires further colour mixing and LUTs at totally different signal ranges to keep them consistent. The calibration can also be imperfect because the profile targets a pink main that isn’t inside the Pixel 3a panel’s native gamut. The resulting white stability for the Adaptive profile continues to be consistent, however the pink and blue LEDs are quite finicky under 10% sign degree.

Google Pixel 3a Display Overview

SpecificationGoogle Pixel 3aNotesSortOLED

PenTile Diamond Pixel

ManufacturerSamsung Display Co.Measurement5.0 inches by 2.4 inches

5.6-inch diagonal

12.three sq. inches

Resolution2220×1080 pixels

18.5:9 pixel facet ratio

Actual variety of pixels is barely much less as a consequence of rounded cornersPixel Density312 purple subpixels per inch

441 green subpixels per inch

312 blue subpixels per inch

PenTile Diamond Pixel displays have fewer purple and blue subpixels in comparison with green subpixelsDistance for Pixel Acuity<11.0 inches

<7.eight inches for achromatic picture


Distances for just-resolvable pixels with 20/20 vision. Typical smartphone viewing distance is about 12 inchesBrightness442 nits @ 50% APL

406 nits @ 100% APL

484 nits @ 1% APL


14% variance with APL

Dynamic brightness is the change in display luminance in response to displayed content material APLAngular Shift-25% brightness shift

ΔE = 5.7 colour shift

Measured at a 30-degree incline

Average 2.29


Common 2.31Commonplace is a straight gamma of two.20White Point6521 Okay
ΔE = zero.9

Indistinguishable from good

6542 Okay
ΔE = 0.9

Accurate to plain

Normal is 6504 OkayColour DistinctionAverage ΔE = zero.eight ± 0.5

Maximum ΔE = 2.5
at 75% blue
for sRGB

Exceptionally correct

Common ΔC = 12.three

ΔC = 12.three for purple / ΔH = 5.four in the direction of yellow

ΔC = 24.9 for inexperienced / ΔH = 4.1 in the direction of cyan

ΔC = 12.9 for blue / ΔH = 0.2 in the direction of cyan

Very vibrant

ΔE values under 2.three appear correct

ΔE values under appear indistinguishable from good

ΔC measures distinction just in saturation relative to sRGB colors

ΔH measures distinction in hue relative to sRGB colors

Pixel 3a Boards and Product Page

Interested within the Pixel 3a? Be a part of the XDA boards for the system the place you possibly can ask questions and share accessories, ideas, tips, and other mods. If you wish to buy the system, you’ll be able to go to its product page on the Google Store. The Pixel 3a could be bought from the Google Retailer should you stay in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, India, Eire, Italy, Japan, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, or the USA.

Google Pixel 3a ForumsGoogle Retailer Product Page

Need more posts like this delivered to your inbox? Enter your e mail to be subscribed to our publication.